How debating works
Debating has a lot of similarities with politics - be that at
Westminster, Holyrood, in a trade union, or in a school student
committee.
Motions
A motion, or topic, that needs discussed is put forward to the
group. Lets imagine you are on a student committee discussing
This house would make school uniforms more fashionable. We
say "this house", meaning the group of people you are trying to
convince of your point. In our competition, you'll get your motion
around two weeks before the first round, and know what side
you are speaking on - so there is lots of time for coaches and
teams to prepare.
Format
There are various formats but our competition has two teams of
two people each taking a different side of the motion. All each
person has to do is stand up and deliver a speech - perhaps two to
four key points they think will convince people to agree with their
side of the argument. The speakers will take it in turns - first a
speaker from the proposing team (the people who agree with the
motion), then the opposing team (the people who disagree with the
motion).
The first speaker - proposing
The first speaker of the first team will probably introduce what
they are going to say, introduce what their team member is going to
say, make their own arguments (including answering any questions)
and sum up.
If you were proposing (agreeing with) the motion above, as the
first speaker you might:
1. Introduce what you are going to
say
I am going to discuss the direct benefits including why people
might be more willing to wear their uniforms if they were more
fashionable and how you might design something more practical for
the modern day…
2. Introduce what your colleague is going to say
My colleague will later talk about longer terms benefits
including that involving students in selecting designs might give
them more of a sense of belonging to a school and might improve a
school's image in the community and with employers for being
forward-thinking and innovative…
3. Make your own arguments
The speaker will then go on to make these arguments. During this
period the other side will also have a chance to ask
questions:
So my first point - at the moment a lot of pupils vary their
uniform by adding to it, or wearing different styles of clothes and
jewellery that are just within the rules but actually means
everyone looks very different - sometimes you can't even tell if
they are from our school or another…
Asking a question
At this point someone from the other side might try to ask a
question (we call this offering a 'point of information'). If you
allow them to, they might ask:
But won't pupils do just the same with a new uniform, because
everyone wants to look different?
You might reply
We think that is much less likely, we think lots of pupils vary
the uniform because is boring - but if it was more fashionable and
there were options built in that still worked overall to give a
common sense of identity then we don't think students would vary it
so much.
4. Summing up
After you have presented all your arguments and allowed any
questions, the next step is to sum up your case - during this bit,
the other side aren't allowed to ask questions:
So in conclusion - I have shown why a more fashionable and
practical uniform would suit pupils, parents and schools better.
While my colleague will continue the case by emphasising the
long-term benefits, the points I have already made clearly
illustrate why this house should vote in favour of the motion.
The first speaker - opposing
The first speaker against the motion will now start their
speech, perhaps by going through the following process:
1. Introduce what you are going to say
I am going to set out the case against the motion, with my key
arguments being that school is about preparation for working life -
where suits and professional dress will be the order of the day,
that 'fashionable' uniforms will go quickly out of date (costing
parents more to replace) and that the benefits uniforms bring come
largely from them being different to what we wear outside
school.
2. Introduce what your colleague is going to say
My colleague will say…
3. Respond to first speaker's arguments
However, before progressing to my main arguments I would like to
take issue with some of the comments made by the first speaker for
the proposition. They said that students are less likely to vary
more fashionable uniform, we on the opposition would like to show
that in Storrie High School, where they tried to involve pupils in
designing a new uniform, after a year-long trial they found
students still wanted to stamp their personal style on what they
wore, whatever the basic uniform looked like.
This last example is very important - a debate is about making
good arguments, but also about showing you have listened to the
other side, understood their arguments, and are willing to
challenge them directly.
4. Summing up
The first speaker for the opposition then needs to sum up their
case
Second speakers
The second speaker of the proposition team will now introduce
what they are going to say, reflect on what their team member has
said, make their own arguments (including answering any questions
and responding to what the other team has said) and sum up. Again,
the opposition team will do the same.
Floor debate
Once both speakers for both teams have delivered their speeches,
there is a debate from 'the floor' - this means anyone in the
audience can ask a question of make a short speech in favour of one
of the sides of the motion. This usually lasts for ten minutes.
Reply speeches
After the floor debate one speaker from each team gets three
minutes to sum up their overall position at the end of the debate.
This will include their own arguments and counters to the argument
of the other side - and should leave the audience in no doubt as to
who is offering the winning side of the case
Join the debating competition
Every year we've managed to get new schools to join the our
competition with teams who have never debated before - and some
have even got to the semi finals on their first attempt (that means
beating over 120 schools in Scotland). See the main debating page for
full details on taking part.